Qualitative Criminology (QC)
Abstract
"This paper aims to introduce and teach readers step-by-step how to conduct a meta-ethnography within the field of criminology. In order to accomplish this, we purposefully selected a very narrow area of study, professional criminals as presented in well-known classic criminological monographs and then further restricted it to a rational choice perspective, a theoretical rubric easily addressed via the meta-ethnography. These limiting decisions were done so that readers would not get lost in the substance of the meta-ethnography. A search of qualitative research monographs and related online bibliographic databases identified a total of 32 research monographs, 6 of which met the inclusion criteria for the critical appraisal process. Following the methodological approach offered by Noblit and Hare’s (1988) traditional meta-ethnography analytical framework, 24 of the most prevalent rational choice concepts were identified and collapsed into a Line of Argument Synthesis of 11 metaphors highlighting the intrinsic and nuanced connections among taken-for-granted rational choice concepts (e.g., rationality, perceptions of risks/costs/benefits, etc.), criminal decision-making processes, and related lifestyle. The implications of meta-ethnography as a methodological tool for theoretical assessment in criminology and criminal justice are discussed."
Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-No Derivative Works 4.0 International License.
Recommended Citation
Wholl, Douglas J.; Palacios, Wilson R.; Cochran, John K.; and Sellers, Christine S.
(2013)
"A Formative Approach in Applying a Meta-
Ethnography across the Qualitative Professional
Criminal Literature,"
Qualitative Criminology (QC): Vol. 1:
No.
1, Article 4.
Available at:
https://dc.swosu.edu/qc/vol1/iss1/4
Included in
Criminal Law Commons, Criminology Commons, Criminology and Criminal Justice Commons, Legal Theory Commons, Other Law Commons, Other Legal Studies Commons