Qualitative Criminology (QC)
Abstract
This paper explores the evolution of resentencing/parole mechanisms for youth lifers in California through the lens of lived experience. We use a case study approach with a triangulation of data sources, including qualitative interviews, parole hearing transcripts, and state legislation. For three purposively selected cases, we analyze the emotional experience of seeking resentencing/parole and analyze how the parole board determined suitability for release based on standard parole factors as well as “youth-specific” mitigation considerations. In all three cases, the parole board leaned heavily on standard parole factors such as demonstration of remorse and insight, compliant prison behavior, and participation in rehabilitation programming. However, as California legislation evolved from 2012 onward, the parole board gave greater weight to youthfulness as mitigation rather than a risk factor for continued criminality. These case studies provide a rich lens to understand how resentencing/parole policies and procedures are experienced by individuals whose freedom is at stake.
Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-No Derivative Works 4.0 International License.
Recommended Citation
Abrams, Laura S.; Canlione, Kaylyn C.; Ouellet, Leah; and Melillo, Audrey I.
(2024)
"Pathways to Freedom: The Evolution of the Parole Process for Youth Lifers in California,"
Qualitative Criminology (QC): Vol. 13:
No.
1, Article 5.
Available at:
https://dc.swosu.edu/qc/vol13/iss1/5
Included in
Criminal Law Commons, Criminology Commons, Criminology and Criminal Justice Commons, Legal Theory Commons, Other Law Commons, Other Legal Studies Commons