Complexities of appellate law: Experiences and perspectives of Utah indigent appellate attorneys

Authors

Whitney Howey, University of Utah
Stephanie Kathan, University of California-Los Angeles
Jeremiah W. Jaggers, University of Utah
Chris Cambron, University of Utah

Abstract

"Indigent appellate attorneys experience high stress due to their unique roles and responsibilities. Very little scientific research examines the lives and experiences of attorneys in the workplace. Characterizing and describing the variety of complexities and challenges Utah appellate attorneys face within their work provides information towards filling the profession’s gaps, stressors, and occupational needs. A sample of five Utah appellate attorneys were interviewed to better understand their perspectives and experiences in the workplace. We used thematic analysis to identify themes related to Utah appellate attorney experiences and perspectives. We identified four major themes from the data, including Personal approach, Working with clients, the 23B motion, and Waiting. Indigent appellate attorneys need well-established and enforced caseload standards. Further research is needed to develop adequate caseload standards and lessen the burden and stressors for appellate attorneys."

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-No Derivative Works 4.0 International License.

Recommended Citation

Howey, Whitney; Kathan, Stephanie; Jaggers, Jeremiah W.; and Cambron, Chris (2025) "Complexities of appellate law: Experiences and perspectives of Utah indigent appellate attorneys," Qualitative Criminology (QC): Vol. 14: No. 2, Article 5.
Available at: https://dc.swosu.edu/qc/vol14/iss2/5